|   | 
                Carl Gustav Jung 
                1875-1961. Swiss-German psychoanalyst who, with Sigmund Freud, 
                was instrumental in bringing psychology into the twentieth 
                century by developing one of several theories of the 
                unconscious. He and Freud worked closely for several years, but 
                eventually split on the role of sexuality in human neuroses. 
                Jung went on to develop his own theories, which he called 
                'analytical psychology.' Jung is also famous for his concept of 
                the 'collective unconscious' shared by all human minds. From 
                1911 to 1914, Jung served as president of the International 
                Psychoanalytic Association, a very prestigious organization of 
                psychologists. He was also given chair positions at the 
                universities of Basel and Zurich. | 
            
              | 
[1] From Erinnerungen, Traume, Gedanken von C. G. 
Jung, Aufgezeichnicht und herausgegeben von Aniela Jaffé, (Olten: Walter-Verlag, 
1988), pp. 378-79. 
          
DURING THE time of my relationship to Freud I found a fatherly friend in 
Théodore Flournoy. He was already an old man when I got to know him. 
Unfortunately he died only a few years later. As I was still a doctor at the 
Burgholzli when I read his book, From India to the Planet Mars, it made a 
great impression on me. I wrote to Flournoy that I wanted to translate it into 
German. It was after half a year that I received his reply, in which he 
apologized for having let my question lie unanswered for so long. To my regret, 
he had already appointed another translator[2].
 [2] It was only in 1914 that an anonymous 
German translation appeared - Ed.: Sonu Shamdasani.
 
 Later I visited him in Geneva, and as I gradually recognized where Freud's 
limits lay, I went to him from time to time, and I talked with him. It was 
important to me to hear what he thought of Freud, and he said very intelligent 
things about him. Most of all, he put his finger on Freud's rationalism, which 
made much of him understandable, as well as explaining his onesidedness.
 
 In 1912 I induced Flournoy to attend the congress in Munich, at which the break 
between Freud and myself took place. His presence was an important support for 
me.
 
 I had the feeling in those years - and especially after the parting of ways with 
Freud - that I was still too young to be independent. I still needed support, 
and above all someone with whom I could talk openly. This I found in Flournoy, 
and therefore he soon represented to me a kind of counterpoise to Freud. With 
him I could really discuss all the problems that scientifically occupied me - 
for example, on somnambulism, on parapsychology, and the psychology of religion. 
I had no one else who shared my interests in these matters. Flournoy's views lay 
completely in my line and gave me many a suggestion. His concept of the 
"imagination créatrice," which particularly interested me, was an idea I adopted 
from him.
 
 I learned a great deal from him - above all, the way and manner to consider a 
patient, the loving absorption in its history. This was how I borrowed one of 
his cases, namely that of Miss Miller in Transformations and Symbols of the 
Libido (1912), and subjected it to a careful analysis.
 
 I had long been interested in the connections of the fantasy products of 
schizophrenics, and Flournoy helped me to understand them better. He saw the 
problems whole, and above all saw them objectively. To him, the facts were 
important, what took place. He went at a case with the utmost caution and never 
lost sight of the whole. My fundamental impression of Flournoy's scientific 
attitude was that he had a truly "objective" approach, and by comparison with 
Freud that seemed to me a very great merit. Freud had a dynamic and penetrating 
way: he expected something from his cases. Flournoy wanted nothing. He saw with 
detachment, and saw clearly. Under the influence of Freud I acquired knowledge, 
but nothing became clear. Flournoy taught me to maintain a distance between 
myself and the object, and supported me in the effort to classify and maintain 
things in a broad horizon. His method was more descriptive, without letting in 
suppositions, and in spite of a warm and lively interest in the patient, he 
always held himself at a considerable distance. Thus he never lost sight of the 
whole.
 
 Flournoy was a cultivated and distinguished personality, very finely educated, 
intellectually balanced, and with a differentiated sense of proportion. All this 
was very beneficial for me. He was a professor of philosophy and psychology. He 
was strongly influenced by Jamesian pragmatism - a viewpoint that is uncongenial 
to the German spirit and has therefore not been given the attention it deserves. 
But pragmatism is especially for psychology not of little importance. What I 
especially esteemed in Flournoy was his philosophical manner of consideration 
and above all his critical judgement, which was founded on a comprehensive 
culture.
 
 Translated by Sonu Shamdasani.
 Note:  
The  above article was taken from Théodore Flournoy's "From India to the Planet 
Mars" (reprint: Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994.). |